Skip to content
LuckMonitor

Tetris Didn't Win at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

Whenever a significant awards ceremony approaches, one notices a clamor for introducing of new categories to honor overlooked contributions and delight the hearts of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

My colleague previously argued supporting a scary games classification. That would rule. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, which is a passionate advocate's mission. However, I must insist for pushing forward since similar to single-minded supporters, I possess a compelling case backing this proposal remains most pressing above others. Here's the proposal: We need a classification for brain-teasing titles.

Categorizing Game Types

Organizing artistic expressions defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and inevitably generate discussions resulting in unclear classifications. There’s a reason cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents a necessary evil for the industry of video games, which are so diverse they hardly constitute a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to have a chance for representation, specific award classifications remain vital.

Current Gaming Award Categories

The major gaming awards presently include classifications covering Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these classifications actually cover numerous genres, and you can find room for most games within them.

Different situation exists for logic-based experiences. No suitable classification appears for their placement. Consider three of outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: structural challenges from a specific release, fast-paced pattern recognition from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. Where could they possibly go among existing types? Unfortunately, nowhere.

Recognition Challenges

There are dozens of brilliant puzzle games launched regularly that have no home at major award shows, if they accidentally match award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

  • A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated for anything in 2014
  • Another imaginative release received no nominations in 2019
  • Popular arranging title was overlooked in 2021
  • Just some logic titles managed to sneak into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're modest productions, yet the craft in brain-teasers carries substantial weight. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among the most-played games globally maintaining this status for an extended period.

The famous puzzle experience competes with famous sandbox experiences competing to become best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and engaging with diverse game types.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Puzzle games wouldn’t have that issue. One could readily select five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave many worthy titles.

To emphasize again, these represent titles that otherwise have no home at major gaming awards. Puzzle game makers are working at the hard edge game development, producing among most fundamental forms within interactive entertainment. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. Don't make them wait 35 years.

The writer

Robert Marshall

A data scientist and writer fascinated by the intersection of luck and statistics, sharing insights from years of research.

LuckMonitor

Type to search articles.